From public reason to deliberative democracy

pages: 237-256

  • Ivan Mladenović Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade

Abstract

In this paper I shall investigate the relationship between public reason and deliberative democracy, mainly as it is presented in Rawls’s later political theory. Against the critics who claim that Rawls has no deliberative democratic theory, I shall argue that he presented a complex view of public deliberation that contains a set of formal and substantive requirements derived from the idea of public reason. My main aim in this paper is to defend and further elaborate the thesis that Rawls’s later political theory is crucially important for deliberative democracy. Furthermore, in light of the recent literature on deliberative democracy, I examine the relevance of Rawls’s view for addressing some current problems, but also look at some limits of the public reason perspective. Keywords: public reason, deliberative democracy, reasonableness, consensus, majority rule

References

Bohman, James and Henry S. Richardson (2009), „Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and ‘Reasons that All Can Accept’“, Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 253–274.

Chambers, Simone (2003), „Deliberative Democratic Theory“, Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307–326.

Cohen, Joshua (1997), „Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy“, in: Bohman J. and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 67–89.

Freeman, Samuel (2007), „Public Reason and Political Justification“, in: Freeman, S., Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–256.

Freeman, Samuel (2000), „Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment“, Philosophy & Public Affairs 29: 371–418.

Gintis, Herbert, Henrich, Joseph, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Robert and Ernst Fehr (2008), „Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality“, Social Justice Research 21: 241– 253.

Knight, Jack and James Johnson (2011), The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Larmore, Charles (2003), „Public Reason“, in: Freeman, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–393.

Mansbridge, Jane with James Bohman, Simone Chambers, David Estlund, Andreas Føllesdal, Archon Fung, Cristina Lafont, Bernard Manin and José Luis Martí (2010), „The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy“, Journal of Political Philosophy, 18: 64–100.

O’Neill, Onora (1997), „Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism“, Philosophical Review 106: 411–428.

O’Neill, Onora (1986), „The Public Use of Reason“, Political Theory 14: 523–551.

Quong, Jonathan (2014), „On the Idea of Public Reason“, in: Mandle, Jon and David A. Reidy (eds.), A Companion to Rawls, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 265–280.

Rawls, John (2005), Political Liberalism, Expanded Edition, New York: Columbia University Press.

Rols, Džon (2003), „Još jednom o ideji javnog uma“, u: Rols, Dž., Pravo naroda sa „Još jednom o ideji javnog uma“, Beograd: Alexandria Press/NSPM, str. 169–228.

Rols, Džon (1998), Politički liberalizam, Beograd: Filip Višnjić.

Saward, Michael (2002), „Rawls and Deliberative Democracy“, in: Passerin D’Entreves, M. (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 112–130.
Published
2016-02-03
How to Cite
MLADENOVIĆ, Ivan. From public reason to deliberative democracy. Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, [S.l.], v. 27, n. 1, feb. 2016. ISSN 2334-8577. Available at: <http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=368>. Date accessed: 17 nov. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1601237M.
Section
STUDIES AND ARTICLES