Debt resistance: Beyond or within capitalism?

pages: 137-157

  • Tamara Caraus Center for Advanced Studies, Southeast Europe, University of Rijeka

Abstract

The empirical cases of debt resistance show that the most coherent way of resisting debt consists mainly in debt cancelation or a jubilee. But is debt cancellation, even on a mass scale, a sufficient form of debt resistance or resistance should aim at a deeper restructuring of the economic system that creates indebtedness? The aim of this paper is to examine if it is possible to formulate an argument for debt resistance to a financial economy that creates debt, instead of becoming indebted and then calling for debt forgiveness, jubilee and cancellation. In order to arrive at such an argument, this paper analyzes firstly the arguments on debt resistance formulated by David Graeber in Debt: the First 5,000 Years and by Maurizio Lazzarato in The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition, pointing to some common contradictions and shortcomings of Graeber’s and Lazzarato’s arguments which make debt foundational and inhibit the debt resistance instead of radicalizing it. The paper argues that an emphasis on the contingency and contestability of debt enhances resistance to debt and resistance to the neoliberal system as such. Keywords: resistance, debt, neoliberalism, contingency, contestability

References

Balibar, Étienne (2013), „Politics of the Debt“, Postmodern Culture, 23 (3).
Butler, Judith (1992), „Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism“, in J. Butler and J. W. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political, 3–21. New York and London: Routledge.
Caffentzis, George (2014), „Against the Debt Economy“, Red Pepper, Feb.–March.
Celikates, Robin (2006), „From Critical Social Theory to a Social Theory of Critique: On the Critique of Ideology after the Pragmatic Turn“, Constellations, 13 (1): 21–40.
Cooke, Maeve (2006), Resurrecting the Rationality of Ideology Critique“, Constellations, 13 (1): 4–20.
Drelichman Mauricio, and Voth, Hans-Joachim (2013), „Contingent Sovereign Debt Contracts: The Historical Perspective“ in CESifo DICE Report 3/2013.
Fumerton, Richard and Hasan, Ali (2010), „Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification“. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/justep-foundational/.
Graeber, David (2011), Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn: Melville House Publishing.
Harvey, David, (2007), A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: University Press.
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2012), The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition. Amsterdam: Semiotext(e).
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2014), Marcel Duchamps ou le Refus de Travail. Paris: Les Prairies.
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2014), Signs and Machines. Amsterdam: Semiotext(e).
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2015), Governing by Debt Amsterdam: Semiotext(e).
Lefort, Claude (1988), Democracy and Political Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984), The Post-modern Condition: A Report on Know ledge, G. Bennington and B. Massumi (trans). Minneapolis: University of Minne sota Press.
Manfred B. Steger and Ravi K. Roy, (2010), Neoliberalism A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: University Press.
Mann, Bruce H. (2009), Republic of Debtors Bankruptcy in the Age of American Independence. Harvard University Press.
Marchart, Oliver (2007), Post-foundational Political Theory, Political Difference in Nancy, Badiou, Lefort and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Meillassoux, Quentin (2010), After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contin gency. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ostry, Jonathan, D. Ghosh, Atish R., and Raphael Espinoza Raphael, (2015), „When Should Public Debt Be Reduced?“ http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1510.pdf.
Pettitfor, Ann (2005), „The Economic bondage of debt – and the birth of a new movement“, in The Global Resistance Reader, L. Amoore (ed.), 311–318. Routledge.
Pines, Christopher (1993), Ideology and False Consciousness: Marx and His Historical Progenitors. New York: SUNY Press.
Rorty, Richard (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, Andrew (2014), Creditocracy and the Case for Debt Refusal. OR Books.
Slothuus, Lukas (2013), Review: Maurizio Lazzarato, The Making of the Indebted Man.
http://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2013/870.
Toscano, Alberto (2014), „Alien Mediations: Critical Remarks on The Making of the Indebted Man“ http://thenewreader.org/Issues/1/AlienMediations.
Weber, Samuel (2013), „The Debt of the Living“, Postmodern Culture 23 (3).
White, Stephen K. (2000), Sustaining Affirmation. The Strength of Weak Ontology in Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wortham, Simon Morgan (2013), „What We Owe to Retroactivity: The Origin and Future of Debt“, Postmodern Culture, 23 (3).
Published
2016-02-03
How to Cite
CARAUS, Tamara. Debt resistance: Beyond or within capitalism?. Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, [S.l.], v. 27, n. 1, feb. 2016. ISSN 2334-8577. Available at: <http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=373>. Date accessed: 26 sep. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1601137C.
Section
NEW PERSPECTIVES ON DEBT AND ECONOMY