The Ethics of Drone Warfare
The paper investigates the compatibility of the modern technologies of warfare, specifically the use of offensive drones, with traditional military ethics and suggests that the new technologies radically change the value system of the military in ways which make large parts of the traditional military ethics inapplicable. The author suggests that Agamben’s concept of ‘effectivity’ through ‘special actions’ which mark one’s belonging to a particular community or profession is a useful conceptual strategy to explore the compatibility of drone warfare with traditional military ethics; this strategy shows mixed results at best.
Keywords: effectivity, warfare, drones, technology, military ethics
Bachmann, Klaus and Fatić, Aleksandar (2015), The UN International Criminal Tribunals: Transition Without Justice, London: Routledge.
BBC (2015), ‘ HARDtalk Brandon Bryant Former US Drone Operator’,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U2kPuQ9TxE, 13 April.
Best, Geoffrey (1994), War & Law Since 1945, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bunstetter, Daniel and Brown, Megan (2013), ‘From Jus ad Bellum to Jus ad Vim: Recalibrating Our Understanding of the Moral Use of Force’, Ethics & International Affairs 27, 1: 87–106.
Fatić, Alekandar (2015), ‘The Epistemology of Intelligence Ethics’, in Galliott, Jai and Reed, Warren (eds), Ethics and the Future of Spying: Technology, National Security and Intelligence Collection, London: Routledge: 39–51.
Fatić, Aleksandar (2016), Virtue as Identity: Emotions and the Moral Personality, London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
Grossman, Dave (2009), On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Howe, Paul (2005), Leadership and Training for the Fight, Bloomington, IN: Author House.
The National Post (2015), ‘Extremely rational’ Anonymous hacktivist Matt DeHart avoids 70-year prison term with child porn plea deal’, 13 November.
Wiebes, Cees (2003), Intelligence and the War in Bosnia 1992–1995, Muenster: LIT Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Philosophy and Society will be Open-Access articles distributed under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.