Conjuring legitimacy: Shakespeare’s Macbeth as contemporary English politics
The text provides a political reading of Shakespeare’s Macbeth, claiming that the play is responding to the curious connection between witchcraft and state power in the preceding century, as well as contemporary political events. Namely, practices variously labeled as witchcraft, magic, conjuring were an integral aspect of English politics and struggles over royal succession in the sixteenth century; even more so were the witch hunts and attempts by British monarchs to control witchcraft. These issues reached a head with the accession of James VI of Scotland to the English throne in 1603, and the Gunpowder Plot in 1605. On the surface, Shakespeare’s play, written in the immediate aftermath of the failed attempt at regicide, brings these historical and political issues together in an effort to legitimize James’ rule. However, the article shows that a closer look reveals a more complicated, indeed subversive undercurrent at play. Paradoxically, while Macbeth does provide James with legitimacy, at the same time it calls into question the grounds of that legitimacy.
Čavoški, Kosta (2019) Politička filozofija u Šekspirovim dramama [The Political Philosophy in Shakespeare’s Dramas]. Belgrade: Catena Mundi.
Clark, Stuart (1999), Thinking with Demons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Sandra and Mason, Pamela (eds.) (2015), William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, London: Bloomsbury.
Federici, Silvia (2004), Caliban and the Witch. Brooklyn: Autonomedia.
Ginzburg, Carlo (1991), Ecstasies. Deciphering the Witches’ Sabbath. Translated by Raymond Rosenthal. New York: Pantheon Books.
Glendon, Mary Ann (2011), The Forum and the Tower. How Scholars and Politicians Have Imagined the World, from Plato to Eleanor Roosevelt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herman, Peter C. (2007), “Macbeth: Absolutism, the Ancient Constitution, and the Aporia of Politics,” in Constance Jordan and Karen Cunningham (eds.) The Law in Shakespeare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herrington, Hunley Whatley (1919), “Witchcraft and Magic in the Elizabethan Drama,” The Journal of American Folklore 32: 447–485.
James VI, The Trew Law of Free Monarchies: or the Reciprock and Mvtvall Dvetie betwixt a Free King and His Naturall Subjects, (internet) available at: https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/the-true-law-of-free-monarchies-by-king-james-vi-and-i (viewed 10 August 2020).
MacFarlane, Alan (1999), Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England. A Regional and Comparative Study. London: Routledge.
Mackay, Christopher S. (2006), The Hammer of the Witches. A Complete Translation of Malleus Maleficarum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, Robert (ed.) (2002), The Lancashire Witches. Histories and Stories. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Riebling, Barbara (1991), “Virtue’s Sacrifice: A Machiavellian Reading of Macbeth,” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 31 (2): 273-286.
Walzer, Michael (1973), “Regicide and Revolution,” Social Research 40(4): 617–642.
—. (1963), “Puritanism as a Revolutionary Ideology,” History and Theory 3(1): 59–90.
Watt, Diane (1997), Secretaries of God: Women Prophets in Late Medieval and Early Modern England. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
Willis, Garry (1995), Witches & Jesuits. Shakespeare’s Macbeth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Richard (2002), “The Pilot’s Thumb: Macbeth and the Jesuits,” in Robert Poole (ed.), The Lancashire Witches, Manchester, Manchester University Press, pp. 126–146.
Young, Francis (2018), Magic as a Political Crime in Medieval and Early Modern England. A History of Sorcery and Treason. London: Bloomsbury.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Philosophy and Society will be Open-Access articles distributed under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.