Autography and Infrapolitics


  • Maddalena Cerrato Texas A&M University, Department of International Affairs



infrapolitics, autography, passage, mourning, expatriation, singularity, deconstruction, existence


This article explores the relation between infrapolitics and autography in the work of Alberto Moreiras. This way, it offers a possible key to read Moreiras’ most recent publications Infrapolitics. A Handbook and Uncanny Rest in connection to his earlier production. The relation to autography emerges as inherent and necessary to infrapolitics, as well as key to understanding infrapolitics in terms of a turn of deconstruction toward existence. Autography reveals itself as the incision of singularity that enables the emergence of the reciprocal and imperative relationship of thought and existence that is constitutive of infrapolitics. The first part focuses on the inceptive role of autography with respect to a certain preliminary displacement of thought on which infrapolitics depends, and it traces the autography-infrapolitics connection back to the affective register of thought that Moreiras first enounced in his book Tercer espacio. The second part focuses on the essential role that such a connection plays, and it analyzes it with respect to three main aspects of infrapolitical thinking, namely, the idea of an an-archic non-passing passage, the relationship with death and the affinity with the work of mourning, and, finally, the connection with “expatriation”.


Cerrato, Maddalena (2015), “Infrapolitics and Shibumi: Infrapolitical Practice between and beyond Metaphysical Closure and the End of History”, Transmodernity 5 (1): 81–105.

—. (2016), “Alberto Moreiras: Desde la aporía auto/hetero-gráfica hacia posthegemonía e infrapolítica”, Papel Maquina 10: 11–25.

Derrida, Jacques (2006), Specters of Marx, New York: Routledge.

De Mann, Paul (1984), The Rhetoric of Romanticism, New York: Columbia UP.

Freud, Sigmund (1961), Beyond the Pleasure Principle, New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.

Hartman, Geoffrey (2007), “Homage to Glas”, Critical Inquiry 33 (2): 344–61.

Heidegger, Martin (1971), “A Dialogue on Language Between a Japanese and an Inquirer”, On the Way to Language, Peter D. Hertz (trans.), San Francisco: Harper and Row: 1–54.

—. (2003), “Overcoming Metaphysics”, The End of Philosophy, Joan Stambaugh (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 84–110.

—. (2010), Being and Time, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Moreiras, Alberto (2010), “Infrapolitical Literature”, The New Centennial Review 10 (2): 183–204.

—. (2020), Against Abstraction. Notes from an Ex-Latin Americanist, Austin: University of Texas Press.

—. (2021), Tercer espacio: literatura y duelo en América Latina, (Segunda edición, revisada), Splash Editions.

—. (2021b), Infrapolitics. A Handbook, New York: Fordham University Press.

—. (2022), Uncanny Rest, Durham: Duke University Press.

Poblete, Juan (ed.) (2018), New Approaches to Latin American Studies, New York: Routledge.

Rodriguez Matos, Jaime (2015), “Nihilism and the Deconstruction of Time: Notes toward Infrapolitics”, Transmodernity 5 (1): 36–51.

Williams, Gareth (2021), Infrapolitical Passages. Global Turmoil, Narco-Accumulation, and the Post-Sovereign State, New York: Fordham University Press.

Zambrano, Maria (1991), El hombre y lo divino, Madrid: Siruela.



How to Cite

Cerrato, M. (2023) “Autography and Infrapolitics”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 34(1), pp. 76–97. doi: 10.2298/FID2301076C.