Kant on Just War and International Order

Authors

  • Nenad Miličić Department for Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of South Bohemia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101105M

Keywords:

Kant, Just War Theory, International Order, Constitution, Federation of Free States, States of States, World Republic, Cosmopolitan Democracy

Abstract

Kant’s legal and political philosophy is essential for understanding and advancing international order. The article aims to posit arguments that confront the claims that Kant was just war theorist. Since that is the most opposed part of Kant’s political philosophy, mostly due to the misleading interpretation of his argumentation, the author presents Kant’s standpoint on the matters of just war and international order and discusses potential ambiguities between Kant’s and his critics’ theories. Furthermore, the consequences of opponents’ arguments considering states of states, world republic and cosmopolitan democracy in contemporary political philosophy are debated. Finally, the possibility of consent between the three model solutions which are arising from the contemporary international order theory and Kant’s position are compared and analysed. 

References

Brown, Garrett Wallace (2011), “Bringing the state back into cosmopolitanism: The idea of responsible cosmopolitan states”, Political Studies Review 9 (1): 53–66.

Byrd, B. Sharon; Hruschka, Joachim (2008), “From the state of nature to the juridical state of states”, Law and Philosophy 27 (6): 599–641.

Fine, Robert (2011), “Cosmopolitanism and natural law: Rethinking Kant”, in Maria Rovisco and Magdalena Nowicka (ed.), The Ashgate research companion to cosmopolitanism, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 147–162.

Habermas, Jürgen (1996), “The European nation state. Its achievements and its limitations. On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship”, Ratio Juris 9 (2): 125–137.

—. (2006), The Divided West, Cambridge: Polity Press Ltd.

—. (2008), “The constitutionalisation of international law and the legitimation problems of a constitution for world society”, Constellations 15 (4): 444–455.

—. (2018), Inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Harbom, Lotta; Wallensteen, Peter (2007), “Armed Conflict, 1989—2006”, Journal of peace research 44 (5): 623–634.

Hirsch, Phillip-Alexander (2012), “Legalisation of international politics: on the (im) possibility of a constitutionalisation of international law from a Kantian point of view”, Goettingen J. Int’l L. 4: 479–518.

Hobbes, Thomas (1651), Leviathan – Prepared for the McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought, by Rod Hay, London: Green Dragon in St. Pauls Churchyard.

Höffe, Otfried (1998), “Some Kantian reflections on a world republic”, Kantian Review 2: 51–71.

Joas, Hans; Knöbl, Wolfgang (2013), War in social thought: Hobbes to the present, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kant, Immanuel (1996), Practical Philosophy, Mary J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. (2009), Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim (1784), in Amélie Oksenberg Rorty and James Schmidt (eds.), “Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kleingeld, Pauline (2004), “Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and his Ideal of a World Federation”, European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3): 304–325.

—. (2006), “Kant’s Theory of Peace”, in Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 477–504.

Masek, Lawrence (2002), “All’s Not Fair in War: How Kant’s Just War Theory Refutes War Realism”, Public Affairs Quarterly 16 (2): 143–154.

Mikalsen, Kjartan Koch (2013), “Kant and Habermas on International Law”, Ratio Juris 26 (2): 302–324.

Nardin, Terry (2017), “Kant’s republican theory of justice and international relations”, International relations 31 (3): 357–372.

Orend, Brian (1999), “Kant’s Just War Theory”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 37, (2): 323–353.

—. (2007), “Jus Post Bellum: The perspective of a just-war theorist”, Leiden Journal of International Law 20 (3): 571–591.

Riley, Patrick (1979), “Federalism in Kant’s political philosophy”, Publius 9 (4): 43–64.

Ripstein, Arthur (2016), “Just war, regular war, and Perpetual Peace”, Kant-Studien 107 (1): 179–195.

Rossi, Philip J (2012), “Kant’s Cosmopolitanism: Resource for Shaping a |Just Peace’”, in Heinz-Gerhard Justenhoven and William A. Barbieri (ed.), From Just War to Modern Peace Ethics, Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 217–230.

Scheuerman, William E. (2008), “All Power to the (State‐less?) General Assembly!” Constellations 15 (4): 485–492.

Verovšek, Peter J. (2012), “Meeting principles and lifeworlds halfway: Jürgen Habermas on the future of Europe”, Political studies 60 (2): 363–380.

Williams, Howard (2012), Kant and the end of war: A critique of just war theory, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Published

2021-03-30

How to Cite

Miličić, N. (2021) “Kant on Just War and International Order”, Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 32(1), pp. 105–127. doi: 10.2298/FID2101105M.