Some Remarks on Unfocused Hatred: Identity of the Hated One and Criteria of Adequacy

Authors

  • Igor Cvejić Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2103377C

Keywords:

hatred, identity, fittingness, criteria of adequacy, appropriateness, emotions

Abstract

Thomas Szanto has recently argued that hatred could not be a fitting emotion because of its blurred focus. It thus cannot trace the properties of its intentional object. Although I agree with the core of Szanto’s account, I would like to discuss two connected issues that might be of importance. First, I want to address whether the unfittingness of hatred has anything to do with the possibility that the hated person does not identify with what they are hated for. I conclude that if the focus of hatred is blurred, hatred does not trace the identification of the hated person or group. Next, I propose a possibility that (certain) criteria of adequacy of hatred (why someone is treated by members of society as hateworthy) are embedded in the cultural and social framework in such a way that they are not necessarily intelligibly justified by their relation to the focus and import it has. Under such circumstances, with hatred still being unfitting, these criteria create quasi-correctness of hatred (actually, they trace properties of someone being hateworthy). If this is correct, it will enable us to keep the thesis that hatred cannot be fitting. At the same time, we could use political vocabulary to tackle hatred that is common in cases when a group will not give up their commitment to hatred and argue that some people or group of people is not to be hated under the hating group’s own criteria. 

References

Colombetti, Giovanna; Krueger, Joel (2014), “Scaffoldings of the Affective Mind”, Philosophical Psychology 28 (8): 1157–1176.

D’Arms, Justin; Jacobson, Daniel (2000), “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions”, Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 51 (1): 65–90.

Deonna, Julien A.; Terroni, Fabrice (2012), The Emotions. A Philosophical Introduction, London and New York: Routledge.

Goldie, Peter (2009), “Getting Feeling into Emotional Experience in the Right Way”, Emotion Review 1 (3): 232–239.

Griffiths, Paul E.; Scarantino, Andrea (2005), “Emotions in the Wild: The Situated Perspective on Emotion”, in Philip Robbins, Murat Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Helm, Bennet W. (2001), Emotional Reason. Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Value, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

—. (2009), Love, Friendship and the Self. Intimacy, Identification and the Social Nature of Persons, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Hochschild, Arlie (1983), The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feelings. The Barkley: University of California Press.

Stephan, Achim (2017), “On the Adequacy of Emotions and Existential Feelings”, Rivista internacionale de filosofia e psikologia 8 (1): 1–13.

Szanto, Thomas (2018), “In Hate We Trust: The Collectivization and Habitualization of Hatred”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 19: 453–480.

—. (2021), “Can It Be or Feel Right to Hate? On the Appropriateness and Fittingness of Hatred”, Filozofija i društvo 32 (3): 341–368.

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Cvejić, I. (2021) “Some Remarks on Unfocused Hatred: Identity of the Hated One and Criteria of Adequacy”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 32(3), pp. 377–386. doi: 10.2298/FID2103377C.

Issue

Section

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE OBJECT OF HATRED