‘Environmentalism Without Ideology’ and the Dreams of Wiping out Humanity
Keywords:environmentalism, ideology, overpopulation, expertise
My aim is to discuss the rhetoric of expertise as objective, and ideologyand value-free, on the example of environmental policy. The first section introduces examples of the common rhetorical figure of expert, ideologyfree environmental protection, revealing their presuppositions. The second introduces objects of comparison – the cartoonish proposals of wiping out humanity – with the aim of showing that the two groups of proposals assume an analogous rhetoric. The third section discusses some prominent features of various proposals of ‘population control’, along with the links to the current surge of so-called eco-fascism. The aim is to show that all these phenomena represent a scale of the idea of ideology-free environmentalism. The concluding section discusses the distorted understanding of expertise, ideology, and politics, central to examples given in the previous sections, as leading to deplorable ignorance or callous cynicism, and therefore, in effect, a moral failure.
Alston, Philip (2019), “Climate Change and Poverty”, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, for The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations.
Angus, Ian; Butler, Simon (2011), Too Many People?: Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Barnet, Richard (1980), The Lean Years, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Bickerton, Christopher; Invernizzi Accetti, Carlo (2017), “Populism and Technocracy”, in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, Pierre Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326–341.
Biehl, Janet; Staudenmaier, Peter (1995), Ecofascism: Lessons from the German Experience, San Francisco: AK Press.
Cagle, Susie (2019), “‘Bees, not Refugees’: the Environmentalist Roots of Anti immigrant Bigotry”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2019/aug/15/anti?.
Chakrabarti, Manali (2014), “Are There Just Too Many of Us?”, Aspects of India’s Economy 55, https://www.rupe-india.org/55/toomany.html
Church, George M.; Regis, Edward (2014), Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves, New York: Basic Books.
Davis Adam C.; Arnocky, Steven; Stroink, Mirella (2019), “The Problem of Overpopulation: Proenvironmental Concerns and Behavior Predict Reproductive Attitudes”, Ecopsychology 11: 92–100.
Di Chiro, Giovanna (2010), “Polluted Politics? Confronting Toxic Discourse, Sex Panic, and Eco-Normativity”, in Catriona Mortimer-Sandilands, Bruce Erickson (eds.), Queer Ecologies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 199–230.
Ehrlich, Paul (1978), The Race Bomb: Skin Color, Prejudice, and Intelligence, New York: Ballantine Books.
—. (1988), The Population Bomb, New York: Random House.
Freeden, Michael (2003), Ideology: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaita, Raimond (2006), Good and Evil. An Absolute Conception, 2nd edition, London: Routledge.
Gosine, Andil (2010), “Non-white Reproduction and Same-Sex Eroticism: Queer Acts against Nature”, in Catriona Mortimer-Sandilands, Bruce Erickson (eds.), Queer Ecologies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 149–172.
Gupta, Nabanita Datta; Dubey, Amaresh (2003), “Poverty and Fertility – An Instrumental Variables Analysis on Indian Micro Data”, Working Papers 03-11, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.
Hardin, Garrett (1974), “Living on a Lifeboat”, BioScience 24: 561–568.
—. (1991a), “Conspicuous Benevolence and the Population Bomb”, Chronicles 1991: 18–21.
—. (1991b), “How Diversity Should Be Nurtured”, The Social Contract 1: 137–139.
Harvey, David (1974), “Population, Resources, and the Ideology of Science”, Economic Geography 50: 256–277.
Kopnina, Helen; Washington, Haydn (2016), “Discussing Why Population Growth is still Ignored or Denied”, Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 14: 133–143
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.